|
|
ANWR Lies
Harry wants energy independence, without drilling for oil or building new refineries. While harping on foreign energy dependence, Harry and his Harpies continue to block drilling in ANWR.
|
On KNRP Radio, Harry said that ANWR drilling will not help, because there is only a six month supply of oil.
This is simply false
|
- 01.15.2006
|
How out of touch with reality is Harry?
Actually, ANWR could provide all the oil needed by Nevada for 166 years.
How long could your state run on ANWR oil?
Visit http://tinyurl.com/5kf6d to find out.
|
- 01.27.2006
|
A small area in ANWR was set aside by President Carter and a democrat controlled Congress in 1980.
For over 20 years, the estimated oil potential from ANWR has been 10.4 billion barrels.
|
- 01.27.2006
|
|
ANWR can supply 1 million barrels of oil a day, which is equivalent to 20% of the US Domestic Consumption.
|
- 01.27.2006
|
ANWR could supply more oil than 32 of our 37 current suppliers; 2/3rds of the oil from Saudi Arabia, 77% of the oil from Venezuela and nearly all of the oil from Nigeria.
See http://tinyurl.com/ibxg for details
|
- 01.27.2006
|
Could a plumb-bob be dropped from the truth about Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, it would never touch the statements made recently on national television by Senate Majority Leader, Tom Daschle.
With his best impression of South Dakotan sincerity, he looked straight into the camera and said that we should not destroy our last pristine wilderness for six months of oil. This statement arises not from truth or fact, but from the propaganda mills of environmental extremist organizations.
Two issues: 1) Will drilling for oil in ANWR really destroy ANWR, and 2) is there only a six-month supply of oil there? The answer to both questions is a resounding no!
ANWR is 19 million acres. The Coastal Plain, where the oil is, consists of 1.5 million acres. The area affected by proposed drilling is about 1,500 acres. If Mr. Daschle had a trust fund of $19 million dollars, I doubt that he would consider it destroyed if he chose to spend $1,500 on a water well on his own property in order to reduce his dependence on water from sworn enemies.
Daschle's "six-months supply" is based on the low end of the range estimated by the U.S. Geological Survey of 5.7 billion barrels to a high of 16 billion barrels. Were the actual amount of oil in ANWR to be no more than 5.7 billion barrels, the most we could extract would be two million barrels per day because of the pipeline capacity. At that rate, the minimum estimated reserves would last 25 years.
The most probable quantity of ANWR oil is over 10 billion barrels, using today's extraction technology. Now we're talking about a 50-year supply, pumping at maximum capacity.
See the full article at http://tinyurl.com/bdwah
|
World Net Daily - 12.17.2001
|
Now, did you notice the date on the article above? The article was written over 4 years ago - in December 2001 - when Harry's predecessor Tom Daschle was making the same false statement.
What does this say about Harry's credibility when he continues to spread false statements FOUR (4) years after the statement is shown to be false.
He does this simply because he will say anything for partisan advantage.
Harry knowinglys spread false statements and has the nerve to call others corrupt.
|
- 01.15.2006
|
|
